Re: pg_hba.conf.sample wording improvement
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-04-29T05:07:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 28.04.21 16:09, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Looking at it now, I wonder how well do the "hostno" options work. If I > say "hostnogssenc", is an SSL-encrypted socket good? If I say > "hostnossl", is a GSS-encrypted socket good? If so, how does that make > sense? I think for example if you want to enforce SSL connections, then writing "hostnossl ... reject" would be sensible. That would also reject GSS-encrypted connections, but that would be what you want in that scenario.
Commits
-
pg_hba.conf.sample: Reword connection type section
- 3a948ea0a2ce 14.0 landed