Re: wal segment size
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Andrew <adhenry.9@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>, Colin 't Hart
<colinthart@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL General
<pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-12-19T13:09:54Z
Lists: pgsql-general
On Fri, 2025-12-19 at 09:26 +0100, Andrew wrote: > As an oracle dba new to Postgres, I’m used to the concept of context switches and latch issues > with regards to transaction log switches. Does Postgres have a similar mechanism with latching > etc when it switches to a new wal segment that is alleviated when increasing the size of the > wal segments? Not really. PostgreSQL doesn't reuse WAL segments in a circular fashion like Oracle does. At the end of a checkpoint, it creates new, empty WAL segments for future use, so if there is a need to switch to a new segment, there is no need to wait for anything. Yours, Laurenz Albe