Re: Cygwin support

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Kirk Wolak <wolakk@gmail.com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>, Mark Woodward <woodwardm@google.com>
Date: 2025-11-24T17:26:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2025-11-23 Su 6:44 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Since this thread discussed possibly bringing back Cygwin buildfarm
> coverage, you might be interested in this proposed change:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKG%2BBpW%3DKhGHTWGMe0cSETMYZsSygv5jFWD1Y6wcbAn2ecQ%40mail.gmail.com#dad6afc6b54306c6f2a47f7a31f0bb24



Well, I was going to look at reviving a Cygwin animal over the end of 
year break. I have a machine available for it. I have no idea if Cygwin 
even still has the issue ... let me see.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com