Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze)
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: yuzuko <yuzukohosoya@gmail.com>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>,
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>,
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>,
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>,
Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>,
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
Date: 2021-08-03T19:55:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 7/29/21 9:03 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > CCing RMT because I think we need to do something about this for v14. Thanks. We are now aware of it. [...] > I don't think the code as is is fit for v14. It looks like it was rewritten > with a new approach just before the freeze ([1]), and as far as I can tell the > concerns I quoted above weren't even discussed in the whole thread. Alvaro, > any comments? > I discussed this briefly with Alvaro late last night. He's now aware of the issue, but I believe he's away for some days, and probably won't be able to respond until his return. Sorry I don't have more news, but I didn't want anyone thinking this was being ignored. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Keep stats up to date for partitioned tables
- e1efc5b465c8 14.0 landed
- 375aed36ad83 15.0 landed
-
Revert analyze support for partitioned tables
- b3d24cc0f0aa 14.0 landed
- 6f8127b73901 15.0 landed
-
Document ANALYZE storage parameters for partitioned tables
- 41badeaba8be 14.0 landed
-
autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables
- 0827e8af70f4 14.0 landed