Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases

Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>

From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>

To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>

Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2024-11-15T13:45:42Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Undo unintentional ABI break in struct ResultRelInfo.
- ee33d58471de 16.6 landed
- 6bfacd368bb4 17.2 landed
- 17db248f318f 15.10 landed
- 099e711b77b8 14.15 landed
For inplace update durability, make heap_update() callers wait.
- 51ff46de29f6 16.5 cited
Fix btmarkpos/btrestrpos array key wraparound bug.
- 3fa81b62e09b 16.1 cited
Fix calculation of which GENERATED columns need to be updated.
- 8cd190e13a22 14.7 cited

Re: Noah Misch
> I'm hearing the only confirmed impact on non-assert builds is the need to
> recompile timescaledb.  (It's unknown whether recompiling will suffice for
> timescaledb.  For assert builds, six PGXN extensions need recompilation.)

Which 6 extensions are these?

I re-ran the tests on all the extensions on apt.pg.o and didn't see
any failures (timescale and age are already rebuilt).

Christoph