Horton

Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>, Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>, smithpb2250@gmail.com, torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com, horikyota.ntt@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, bungina@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-11-20T00:41:58Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 01:22:21PM +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Oh wow, thanks for noticing that.  I had already rewritten the commit
> message to some extent, but "master" had remained.  Now I pushed the
> patch to branches 14+, having replaced it as you suggested.

Thanks for taking care of this thread, Alvaro.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Fix newly introduced 010_keep_recycled_wals.pl

  2. Avoid deleting critical WAL segments during pg_rewind