Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)
Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-11-05T05:49:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 05:08:41PM +1300, David Rowley wrote: > I was happy enough with my patch with Bertrand's comments. I'm not > sure why unsigned chars are better than chars. It doesn't seem to have > any effect on the compiled code. > I think that unsigned chars is better than char for byte level memory operations (no sign extension issues). Though I agree that using char in this function is not an issue as p is only compared with 0. This is more a matter of taste here. Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Use pg_memory_is_all_zeros() in PageIsVerifiedExtended()
- 03a42c9652f8 18.0 landed
-
Optimize pg_memory_is_all_zeros() in memutils.h
- 5be1dabd2ae0 18.0 landed
-
Remove use of pg_memory_is_all_zeros() in bufpage.c
- e819bbb7c82a 18.0 landed
-
Add pg_memory_is_all_zeros() in memutils.h
- 07e9e28b56db 18.0 landed