Horton

Re: relfilenode statistics

Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-11-05T06:05:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Add more tests for relation statistics with rewrites

Hi,

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 02:51:10PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:27 AM Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Then I think we should go with the "sometimes I don't know the relation OID
> > so I want to use the relfilenumber instead, without changing the user experience"
> > way.
> 
> So does the latest version of the patch implement that principal
> uniformly throughout?

No, please don't look at v6-0001 and 0002 (as mentioned up-thread). The purpose
here is mainly to get an agreement on the design before moving forward.

Does it sound ok to you to move with the above principal? (I'm +1 on it).

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com