Re: small pg_combinebackup improvements
Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-11-01T08:01:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:06:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:41 AM Bertrand Drouvot > <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure about 0001 but I think 0002 deserves a back patch as I think it fits > > into the "low-risk fixes" category [0]. > > I'm inclined to back-patch both, then. We might have more small fixes > and they'll be less risky to back-patch if we back-patch them all. Yeah, that makes fully sense. +1 to back-patch both then. Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
pg_combinebackup: Error if incremental file exists in full backup.
- e367114429e0 17.1 landed
- 0b1765d95950 18.0 landed
-
pg_combinebackup: When reconstructing, avoid double slash in filename.
- 0d635b615d3f 17.1 landed
- 6c24801b1717 18.0 landed