Horton

Re: Use MAX_PARALLEL_WORKER_LIMIT consistently in guc_tables.c

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-10-09T23:51:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 10:28:05PM +0800, Zhang Mingli wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2024 at 20:35 +0800, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm@gmail.com>, wrote:
>> PFA a trivial one-line patch that makes that a bit more consistent.
>
> LGTM.

Makes sense to me as well.  Thanks for the patch.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Use MAX_PARALLEL_WORKER_LIMIT for max_parallel_maintenance_workers