Re: Should rolpassword be toastable?
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-10-03T21:27:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 03:25:54PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: > Thanks for reviewing. I went ahead and committed 0002 since it seems like > there's consensus on that one. I've attached a rebased version of 0001 > with s/characters/bytes. For the reasons discussed upthread [0], I can't bring myself to add an arbitrary limit to the password hash length. I am going to leave 0001 uncommitted for now. [0] https://postgr.es/m/Zu2eT2H8OT3OXauc%40nathan -- nathan
Commits
-
Restrict password hash length.
- 8275325a06ed 18.0 landed
-
Remove pg_authid's TOAST table.
- 6aa44060a3c9 18.0 landed
-
Remove arbitrary restrictions on password length.
- 67a472d71c98 14.0 cited