Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-09-20T00:37:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:03:09AM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > It looks to me like these cases could be modified to accept only > ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE, not ATT_TABLE anymore. The ATT_TABLE cases are > useless anyway, because they're rejected by transformPartitionCmd. Makes sense to me, thanks for the suggestion. What do you think about adding a test with DETACH FINALIZE when attempting it on a normal table, its path being under a different subcommand than DETACH [CONCURRENTLY]? There are no tests for normal tables with DETACH CONCURRENTLY, but as it is the same as DETACH under the AT_DetachPartition subcommand, that does not seem worth the extra cycles. -- Michael
Commits
-
psql: Remove PARTITION BY clause in tab completion for unlogged tables
- 361499538c9d 18.0 landed
-
Remove support for unlogged on partitioned tables
- e2bab2d79204 18.0 landed
-
Remove ATT_TABLE for ALTER TABLE ... ATTACH/DETACH
- bbba59e69a56 18.0 landed
-
Introduce ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE in tablecmds.c
- d69a3f4d70b7 18.0 landed
-
Refactor some code for ALTER TABLE SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED in tablecmds.c
- 9f87da1cffda 18.0 landed
-
Remove tab completion for CREATE UNLOGGED MATERIALIZED VIEW.
- 5c1ce1bbbe5f 18.0 cited