Re: Should rolpassword be toastable?

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Cc: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2024-09-21T20:25:54Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

v4-0001-place-limit-on-password-hash-length.patch (text/plain)

On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 12:27:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nitpick: the message should say "%d bytes" not "%d characters",
> because we're counting bytes.  Passes an eyeball check otherwise.

Thanks for reviewing.  I went ahead and committed 0002 since it seems like
there's consensus on that one.  I've attached a rebased version of 0001
with s/characters/bytes.

-- 
nathan

Commits

Restrict password hash length.
- 8275325a06ed 18.0 landed
Remove pg_authid's TOAST table.
- 6aa44060a3c9 18.0 landed
Remove arbitrary restrictions on password length.
- 67a472d71c98 14.0 cited