Re: Minor refactor: Use more consistent names for the labels of PG_Locale_Strategy

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 04:58:16PM +0200, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> When working on the regex code I noticed that the labels of
> PG_Locale_Strategy had become inconsistent with the addition of
> PG_REGEX_BUILTIN but while at it I also noticed that PG_REGEX_LOCALE_WIDE_L
> and PG_REGEX_LOCALE_1BYTE_L did not make it
> obvious that they were libc-related so I propose a new naming scheme:
> 
> PG_STRATEGY_<type>[_<subtype>]
> 
> I am open for other suggestions of course like keeping the PG_LOCALE_*
> prefix, but in any case I think we should make the enum labels consistent.

+1 for your suggestion, as you are suggesting.  The original intention
when PG_Locale_Strategy got introduced was to have everything named as
PG_REGEX_LOCALE_*, but with the built-in part coming in play in this
code adding "STRATEGY" is cleaner than just "LOCALE".
--
Michael