Re: Fsync (flush) all inserted WAL records

On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 06:00:45PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> Assuming the function has value, as you claim, I see no reason not to
> expose it similarly to pg_current_wal_*(). On top of that you will
> have to test-cover it anyway. The easiest way to do it will be to have
> an SQL-wrapper.

I cannot be absolutely without seeing a patch, but adding SQL
functions in this area is usually very useful for monitoring purposes
of external solutions.
--
Michael