Re: Correctly propagate queryId for utility stmt in function
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-07-19T00:13:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 01:37:40PM +0200, Anthonin Bonnefoy wrote: > For utility statements defined within a function, the queryTree is > copied to a plannedStmt as utility commands don't require planning. > However, the queryId is not propagated to the plannedStmt. This leads > to plugins relying on queryId like pg_stat_statements to not be able > to track utility statements within function calls. You are right, good catch. This leads to only partial information being reported depending on the setting of pg_stat_statements.track. It is a point of detail, but I'd rather expand a bit more the tests on top of what you are proposing: - Upper and down-casing for non-top utility commands, to check that they are counted consistently. - Check with pg_stat_statements.track = 'top' - Not cross-checking pg_stat_statements.track_utility = false is OK. While this qualifies as something that could go down to all the stable branches, it is much easier to think about utility statements in 16~ now that we compile the query IDs depending on their parsed tree, so will apply down to that. pg_stat_statements tests have also been refactored in 16~, but that's a nit here.. -- Michael
Commits
-
Propagate query IDs of utility statements in functions
- 9cd365f28f31 16.4 landed
- 38e271d3c2e8 17.0 landed
- c145f321b681 18.0 landed