Re: Add a GUC check hook to ensure summarize_wal cannot be enabled when wal_level is minimal
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-07-15T20:10:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 04:03:13PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 2:47 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: >> My understanding is that the correctness of this GUC check hook depends on >> wal_level being a PGC_POSTMASTER GUC. The check hook would always return >> true during startup, and there'd be an additional cross-check in >> PostmasterMain() that would fail startup if necessary. After that point, >> we know that wal_level cannot change, so the GUC check hook for >> summarize_wal can depend on wal_level. If it fails, my expectation would >> be that the server would just ignore that change and continue. > > But how do you know that, during startup, the setting for > summarize_wal is processed after the setting for wal_level? You don't, but the GUC check hook should always return true when summarize_wal is processed first. We'd rely on the PostmasterMain() check to fail in that case. -- nathan
Commits
-
Do not summarize WAL if generated with wal_level=minimal.
- 2b5819e2b4d6 17.0 landed
- 402b586d0a9c 18.0 landed
-
Revert "Auto-tune effective_cache size to be 4x shared buffers"
- a16d421ca4fc 9.4.0 cited
-
Un-break ecpg test suite under --disable-integer-datetimes.
- 08c8e8962f56 9.4.0 cited
-
Again fix initialization of auto-tuned effective_cache_size.
- af930e606a32 9.4.0 cited
-
Code review for auto-tuned effective_cache_size.
- 285089696199 9.4.0 cited
-
Auto-tune effective_cache size to be 4x shared buffers
- ee1e5662d8d8 9.4.0 cited