Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revert support for ALTER TABLE ... MERGE/SPLIT PARTITION(S) commands
- 3890d90c1508 18.0 cited
-
When creating materialized views, use REFRESH to load data.
- b4da732fd64e 17.0 cited
-
Revert temporal primary keys and foreign keys
- 8aee330af55d 17.0 cited
-
Avoid needless large memcpys in libpq socket writing
- c4ab7da60617 17.0 cited
-
Enhance nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution.
- 5bf748b86bc6 17.0 cited
-
Introduce a non-recursive JSON parser
- 3311ea86edc7 17.0 cited
-
Combine freezing and pruning steps in VACUUM
- 6dbb490261a6 17.0 cited
-
Allow SIGINT to cancel psql database reconnections.
- cafe1056558f 17.0 cited
-
Provide API for streaming relation data.
- b5a9b18cd0bc 17.0 cited
-
Add hash support functions and hash opclass for contrib/ltree.
- 485f0aa85995 17.0 cited
-
Pull up ANY-SUBLINK with the necessary lateral support.
- 9f133763961e 17.0 cited
-
Read WAL directly from WAL buffers.
- 91f2cae7a4e6 17.0 cited
-
Introduce the dynamic shared memory registry.
- 8b2bcf3f287c 17.0 cited
-
Add macros for looping through a List without a ListCell.
- 14dd0f27d7cd 17.0 cited
-
Support +/- infinity in the interval data type.
- 519fc1bd9e9d 17.0 cited
-
Extend ALTER OPERATOR to allow setting more optimization attributes.
- 2b5154beab79 17.0 cited
-
Consider cheap startup paths in add_paths_to_append_rel
- a8a968a8212e 17.0 cited
Attachments
- master.diff (text/x-diff) patch
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:23:29AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2024-05-22 18:33:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:40:28AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > > On 2024-05-18 11:13:54 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I agree keeping things reasonably short is important. But I don't think you're > > > evenly applying it as a goal. > > > > > > Just skimming the notes from the end, I see > > > - an 8 entries long pg_stat_statements section > > > > What item did you want to remove? Those are all user-visible changes. > > My point here was not that we necessarily need to remove those, but that their > impact to users is smaller than many of the performance impacts you disregard. I liked all your detailed suggestions so applied the attached patch. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.