Re: Fix an incorrect assertion condition in mdwritev().

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Xing Guo <higuoxing@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-06-03T22:43:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 03:24:07PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'm confused - isn't using common/int.h entirely sufficient for that? Nearly
> all architectures have more efficient ways to check for 64bit overflows than
> doing actual 128 bit math.

Oh, right.  We could just plug in pg_add_u32_overflow here.  Funny
thing is that I'm the one who committed these toys with
__builtin_add_overflow(), still nobody has found a case where this one
would be useful.  At least until now.
--
Michael

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Improve assertion in mdwritev()

  2. Provide vectored variants of smgrread() and smgrwrite().