Re: Fix an incorrect assertion condition in mdwritev().
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Xing Guo <higuoxing@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-06-03T22:43:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 03:24:07PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > I'm confused - isn't using common/int.h entirely sufficient for that? Nearly > all architectures have more efficient ways to check for 64bit overflows than > doing actual 128 bit math. Oh, right. We could just plug in pg_add_u32_overflow here. Funny thing is that I'm the one who committed these toys with __builtin_add_overflow(), still nobody has found a case where this one would be useful. At least until now. -- Michael
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Improve assertion in mdwritev()
- f04d1c1db011 17.0 landed
-
Provide vectored variants of smgrread() and smgrwrite().
- 4908c5872059 17.0 cited