Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3

Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-05-15T08:33:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 03:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> Hi Bertrand,
> 
> 09.05.2024 15:20, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Oh I see, your test updates an existing dependency. v4 took care about brand new
> > dependencies creation (recordMultipleDependencies()) but forgot to take care
> > about changing an existing dependency (which is done in another code path:
> > changeDependencyFor()).
> > 
> > Please find attached v5 that adds:
> > 
> > - a call to the new depLockAndCheckObject() function in changeDependencyFor().
> > - a test when altering an existing dependency.
> > 
> > With v5 applied, I don't see the issue anymore.
> 
> Me too. Thank you for the improved version!
> I will test the patch in the background, but for now I see no other
> issues with it.

Thanks for confirming!

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Avoid orphaned objects dependencies

  2. Don't try to record dependency on a dropped column's datatype