Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-24T08:56:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:04:40PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Yeah, I think this patch invented a new solution to a problem that > we've solved in a different way everywhere else. I think we should > change it to match what we do in general. As of ba3e6e2bca97, did you notice that test_json_parser_perf generates two core files because progname is not set, failing an assertion when using the frontend logging? -- Michael
Commits
-
Post review fixes for test_json_parser test module
- ba3e6e2bca97 17.0 landed
-
Shrink test file for test_json_parser module
- b8a7bfa33324 17.0 landed
-
Add support for incrementally parsing backup manifests
- ea7b4e9a2a7c 17.0 landed
-
Introduce a non-recursive JSON parser
- 3311ea86edc7 17.0 landed
-
Use incremental parsing of backup manifests.
- 222e11a10ae9 17.0 landed