Horton

Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>, Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-04-09T06:13:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 05:18:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Based on this info, I'm disinclined to put work into trying to
> make the case behave correctly with that old libedit version, or
> even to lobotomize the test case enough so it would pass.

By the way, are you planning to do something like [1]?  I've not
looked in details at the callers of IPC::Run::timeout, still the extra
debug output would be nice.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1100715.1712265845@sss.pgh.pa.us
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Restart BackgroundPsql's timer more nicely.

  2. Implement pg_wal_replay_wait() stored procedure

  3. psql: fix variable existence tab completion