Re: Using the %m printf format more
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2024-03-14T07:04:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 02:33:52PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The 0002 patch looks sensible. It would be good to fix that, otherwise it > could have some confusing outcomes in the future. You mean if we begin to use %m in future callers of emit_tap_output_v(), hypothetically? That's a fair argument. -- Michael
Commits
-
pg_regress: Save errno in emit_tap_output_v() and switch to %m
- 85230a247c74 17.0 landed
-
Use printf's %m format instead of strerror(errno) in more places
- 2c8118ee5d98 17.0 landed
-
Add --copy-file-range option to pg_upgrade.
- d93627bcbe50 17.0 cited