Re: BUG #18363: Assert !ReindexIsProcessingIndex falsified with expression index over select from table
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-02-29T05:46:07Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 09:00:01AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote: > It looks like currentlyReindexedIndex == 0 in this case, so > ReindexIsProcessingIndex() doesn't guard against get_relation_info() -> > _bt_getrootheight() -> _bt_getbuf() -> ReadBuffer() -> ... -> mdread(). Fun. The concurrent case is actually able to work because it looks like the basic definition of the relation exists with its relfilenode. I was looking at that, and it seems to me that the point is not that the index is being reindexed; the point is that we want to prevent access to the index itself while it being built. And that's something that can happen for a reindex as much as a new index. It would be possible to paint an equivalent of SetReindexProcessing() in index_create() for index_build() where a trace of the index OID getting built is kept around, and it would be possible to trigger the same error as when doing a reindex. Hence, if we were to do that, the current ReindexIs*() routines maintaining the list of the indexes being built across transaction states are a bit misnamed, and the error messages would be partially incorrect. I am not sure if this is worth bothering beyond HEAD, or worth bothering at all, but seeing 940489b467 it looks like we do bother even for stable branches. -- Michael
Commits
-
Promote assertion about !ReindexIsProcessingIndex to runtime error.
- f5a465f1a074 17.0 landed
- c0b4dad38e84 12.19 landed
- 940489b46769 15.7 landed
- 8c785d354c61 16.3 landed
- 43cca9de9a0a 13.15 landed
- 09f09884c18d 14.12 landed