Re: Injection points: some tools to wait and wake

Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-02-28T06:20:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 01:26:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:39:59PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > So, I'm ok with the new helper too.
> 
> If both of you feel strongly about that, I'm OK with introducing
> something like that.

Thanks!

>  Now, a routine should be only about waiting on
> pg_stat_activity to report something, as for the logs we already have
> log_contains().

Agree.

> And a test may want one check, but unlikely both.
> Even if both are wanted, it's just a matter of using log_contains()
> and the new routine that does pg_stat_activity lookups.

Yeah, that's also my point of view.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



Commits

  1. Add PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster::wait_for_event()

  2. Add regression test for restart points during promotion

  3. injection_points: Add wait and wakeup of processes