Horton

Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Date: 2024-01-26T03:08:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 05:44:52PM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> On 1/25/24 17:42, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We're talking about 1d35f705e, right?  That certainly looks harmless
>> and potentially useful.  I'm +1 for back-patching.
> 
> That's the one. If we were modifying existing messages I would be against
> it, but new, infrequent (but oh so helpful) messages seem fine.

Well, I'm OK with this consensus on 1d35f705e if folks think this is
useful enough for all the stable branches.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Add more LOG messages when starting and ending recovery from a backup