Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-06-21T15:46:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 11:37:54AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > The release notes have this item: > > Allow specification of physical standbys that must be synchronized > before they are visible to subscribers (Hou Zhijie, Shveta Malik) > > The new server variable is standby_slot_names. > > Is standby_slot_names an accurate name for this GUC? It seems too > generic. +1, I was considering bringing this up, too. I'm still thinking of alternate names to propose, though. -- nathan
Commits
-
Update release notes to reflect recent commit 0f934b0739.
- 58c5f60eb8ce 17.0 landed
-
Rename standby_slot_names to synchronized_standby_slots.
- 2357c9223b71 18.0 landed
- 0f934b0739ad 17.0 landed
-
Add a new slot sync worker to synchronize logical slots.
- 93db6cbda037 17.0 cited