Horton

Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-06-10T16:20:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Add non-text output formats to pg_dumpall

  2. Improve pg_dump/pg_dumpall help synopses and terminology

  3. Non text modes for pg_dumpall, correspondingly change pg_restore

  4. Doc: manually break lines in wide UUID examples.

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 05:45:19PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 5:03 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Is there a particular advantage to that approach as opposed to just using
>> "directory" mode for everything?  I know pg_upgrade uses "custom" mode for
>> each of the databases, so a combo approach would be a closer match to the
>> existing behavior, but that doesn't strike me as an especially strong
>> reason to keep doing it that way.
> 
> A gazillion files to deal with? Much easier to work with individual custom
> files if you're moving databases around and things like that.
> Much easier to monitor eg sizes/dates if you're using it for backups.
> 
> It's not things that are make-it-or-break-it or anything, but there are
> some smaller things that definitely can be useful.

Makes sense, thanks for elaborating.

-- 
nathan