Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-06-10T15:03:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add non-text output formats to pg_dumpall
- 763aaa06f034 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve pg_dump/pg_dumpall help synopses and terminology
- dec6643487bb 18.0 cited
-
Non text modes for pg_dumpall, correspondingly change pg_restore
- 1495eff7bdb0 18.0 landed
-
Doc: manually break lines in wide UUID examples.
- a6524105d20b 18.0 cited
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:52:06PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 4:14 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I'm curious why we couldn't also support the "custom" format. > > Or maybe even a combo - a directory of custom format files? Plus that one > special file being globals? I'd say that's what most use cases I've seen > would prefer. Is there a particular advantage to that approach as opposed to just using "directory" mode for everything? I know pg_upgrade uses "custom" mode for each of the databases, so a combo approach would be a closer match to the existing behavior, but that doesn't strike me as an especially strong reason to keep doing it that way. -- nathan