Horton

Re: Revive num_dead_tuples column of pg_stat_progress_vacuum

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-06-14T00:41:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:38:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> writes:
>> I was about to push the patch but let me confirm just in case: is it
>> okay to bump the catversion even after post-beta1?
> 
> Yes, that happens somewhat routinely.

Up to RC, even after beta2.  This happens routinely every year because
tweaks are always required for what got committed.  And that's OK to
do so now.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Reintroduce dead tuple counter in pg_stat_progress_vacuum.

  2. Use TidStore for dead tuple TIDs storage during lazy vacuum.