Thread

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix documentation for wal_summary_keep_time.

  1. Wrong datatype in docs for wal_summary_keep_time

    hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> — 2024-01-08T16:37:14Z

    Hi,
    I was reviewing new changes, and found out that we now have
    "wal_summary_keep_time" setting, but the docs
    (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/runtime-config-wal.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-WAL-SUMMARIZATION)
    say that it's boolean, while it is integer.
    
    The fix is simple:
    
    #v+
    --- config.sgml 2024-01-05 10:43:17.776276803 +0100
    +++ config.sgml.fixed   2024-01-08 17:35:54.202968175 +0100
    @@ -4179,7 +4179,7 @@
          </varlistentry>
    
          <varlistentry id="guc-wal-summary-keep-time" xreflabel="wal_summary_keep_time">
    -      <term><varname>wal_summary_keep_time</varname> (<type>boolean</type>)
    +      <term><varname>wal_summary_keep_time</varname> (<type>integer</type>)
           <indexterm>
            <primary><varname>wal_summary_keep_time</varname> configuration parameter</primary>
           </indexterm>
    #v-
    
    Best regards,
    
    depesz
    
    
    
    
    
  2. Re: Wrong datatype in docs for wal_summary_keep_time

    Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2024-01-08T23:23:11Z

    On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 05:37:14PM +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
    > I was reviewing new changes, and found out that we now have
    > "wal_summary_keep_time" setting, but the docs
    > (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/runtime-config-wal.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-WAL-SUMMARIZATION)
    > say that it's boolean, while it is integer.
    
    Indeed.  I'll try to get this committed tonight unless Robert beats me to
    it.
    
    -- 
    Nathan Bossart
    Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: Wrong datatype in docs for wal_summary_keep_time

    Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2024-01-09T03:47:22Z

    On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 05:23:11PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
    > On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 05:37:14PM +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
    >> I was reviewing new changes, and found out that we now have
    >> "wal_summary_keep_time" setting, but the docs
    >> (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/runtime-config-wal.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-WAL-SUMMARIZATION)
    >> say that it's boolean, while it is integer.
    > 
    > Indeed.  I'll try to get this committed tonight unless Robert beats me to
    > it.
    
    I noticed that the docs also fail to mention how the value of this
    parameter is interpreted when specified without units, so I've put together
    a v2 patch that fixes this, too.
    
    -- 
    Nathan Bossart
    Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
    
  4. Re: Wrong datatype in docs for wal_summary_keep_time

    Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2024-01-09T17:38:27Z

    On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 09:47:22PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
    > I noticed that the docs also fail to mention how the value of this
    > parameter is interpreted when specified without units, so I've put together
    > a v2 patch that fixes this, too.
    
    And committed.  Thanks for the report!
    
    -- 
    Nathan Bossart
    Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com