Re: Logical replication is missing block of rows when sending initial sync?

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 03:40:35PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 11/15/23 02:41, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> > Dear Tomas, Depesz,
> > 
> >>
> >>> I'll try reproducing this locally over the weekend. Should I use the
> >>> test_1030.sh script that you shared a week ago, or do I need to do
> >>> something more?
> >>
> >> That question is probably not to me, but to Hayato Kuroda
> > 
> > Just FYI - As I posted, this script could not reproduce the issue. We may use the same table definition
> > but I have not tried yet. I will let you know if I succeeded to reproduce.
> > 
> 
> FYI I think I've reproduced the issue (with a different script), I've
> started a thread on pgsql-hackers:
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/de52b282-1166-1180-45a2-8d8917ca74c6%40enterprisedb.com
> 
> Obviously, I can't be sure it's exactly the same issue, but the symptoms
> seem to match what Depesz reported (gaps in data etc.). I don't know
> what the root cause is, or fix. But there's more info (and scripts) in
> the hackers thread.

Thanks a lot. Much appreciated. It will be over for us with the upgrade
soon, but it's good to know that there might be one less bug in pg
thanks to this :)

Best regards,

depesz