Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-11-12T01:09:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 09:38:53AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 08:00:00AM +0800, jian he wrote: >> diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/type_sanity.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/type_sanity.sql >> index a546ba89..6d806941 100644 >> --- a/src/test/regress/sql/type_sanity.sql >> +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/type_sanity.sql > > Ahah, nice catches. I'll go adjust that on HEAD like the other one > you pointed out. Just note that materialized views have a relam > defined, so the first comment you have changed is not completely > correct. Fixed all that with a9f19c1349c2 for now. -- Michael
Commits
-
Fix inconsistencies for queries on pg_class in type_sanity.sql
- a9f19c1349c2 17.0 landed
-
Allow relkind 'I' in type_sanity test.
- 4b9fbd6be442 17.0 landed