Re: [Code Cleanup] : Small code cleanup in twophase.sql
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Nishant Sharma <nishant.sharma@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-10-10T06:04:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 06:31:42PM +0530, Nishant Sharma wrote: > To support it I have below points:- > > 1) Grepping this table 'test_prepared_savepoint' shows occurrences > only in twophase.out & twophase.sql files. This means that table is > local to that sql test file and not used in any other test file. > > 2) I don't see any comment on why this was not added in the cleanup > section of twophase.sql, but drop for other two test tables are done. > > 3) I ran "make check-world" with the patch and I don't see any failures. Note that sometimes tables are left around in the regression tests for pg_upgrade, so as we can test dedicated upgrade paths for some object types. But, here, I think you're right: this is not a table that matters for an upgrade and the end of the test file also expects a cleanup. So okay for me to drop this table here. -- Michael
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
test_decoding: Remove unnecessary table in twophase test
- 98e89740e5a8 17.0 landed