Re: wal recycling problem
Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
To: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-09-28T17:59:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
## Fabrice Chapuis (fabrice636861@gmail.com): > We have a cluster of 2 members (1 primary and 1 standby) with Postgres > version 14.9 and 2 barman server, slots are only configured for barman, > barman is version 3.7. The obvious question here is: can both of those barmans keep up with your database, or are you seeing WAL retention due to exactly these replication slots? (Check pg_replication_slots). Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space