Re: wal recycling problem

Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>

From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
To: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-09-28T17:59:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
## Fabrice Chapuis (fabrice636861@gmail.com):

> We have a cluster of 2 members (1 primary and 1 standby) with Postgres
> version 14.9 and 2 barman server, slots are only configured for barman,
> barman is version 3.7.

The obvious question here is: can both of those barmans keep up with
your database, or are you seeing WAL retention due to exactly these
replication slots? (Check pg_replication_slots).

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
Spare Space