Re: BUG #18124: PG16 release note document bug in "Add build option to allow testing of small WAL segment sizes"
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, harukat@sraoss.co.jp, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-09-26T16:09:01Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 06:32:48PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:45:04AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2023-09-21 22:08:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes: > > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 6:47 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > >> Uh, it is true that we don't have any segment sizes other than WAL, but > > > >> I am not sure people would easily know that, so I added WAL so people > > > >> knew. > > > > > > > But the commit in question added a new option that can be used to > > > > control the relation segment size -- not the WAL segment size. > > > > Obviously, that's what TAKATSUKA-san meant. > > > > > > Yeah. The release note entry is simply wrong to say it's WAL segment size. > > > > Agreed. Bruce are you committing that bit? > > Yes, I will try to do it tomorrow. Patch applied. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
Commits
-
docs: Clarify --with-segsize-blocks documentation
- 72bf3f0877fe 16.1 landed
- a2c2fbf740fc 17.0 landed