Re: Have better wording for snapshot file reading failure
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-09-15T05:20:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- snapmgr-import-error-v2.patch (text/x-diff) patch v2
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 05:33:35PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > I'd probably just go for something like "snapshot \"%s\" does not exist", > similar to what we report for unknown tables etc. Arguably changing the > errcode to ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT would make this more precise? Good points. Updated as suggested in v2 attached. -- Michael
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Improve error message for snapshot import in snapmgr.c, take two
- 78a33bba4c63 17.0 landed
-
Revert "Improve error message on snapshot import in snapmgr.c"
- bddbbdf99b16 11.22 landed
- 50d44c163352 12.17 landed
- f18efc6f2bc8 13.13 landed
- 1988f8766eeb 14.10 landed
- fe60434af76f 15.5 landed
- 3f94dfc00870 16.1 landed
- be022908cfe2 17.0 landed
-
Improve error message on snapshot import in snapmgr.c
- a4cef3384d6d 11.22 landed
- 33bc7d424695 12.17 landed
- d98cbea20125 13.13 landed
- a7b92d1c6807 14.10 landed
- 19885ab246d8 15.5 landed
- be3dfd3dff03 16.1 landed
- a0d87bcd9b57 17.0 landed