Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
meson: Fix install-quiet after clean
- a9ffb35274fb 18.0 landed
- 4ae03be54734 19 (unreleased) landed
-
oauth: Run Autoconf tests with correct compiler flags
- 3d23f68c5529 18.0 landed
- 990571a08b66 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Link libpq with libdl if the platform needs that.
- 4df477153a6b 19 (unreleased) landed
- 7bd752c1fb8e 18.0 landed
-
Doc: correct spelling of meson switch.
- 3faac9d14063 16.9 landed
- 766d2e673342 17.5 landed
- ac557793d478 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Correct SSL dependency for libpq-oauth.a
- 3db68212a393 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Fix Autoconf build on macOS
- 4ea1254f35b2 18.0 cited
-
oauth: Move the builtin flow into a separate module
- b0635bfda053 18.0 landed
-
Remove a stray "pgrminclude" annotation
- 764d501d24ba 18.0 cited
-
oauth: Simplify copy of PGoauthBearerRequest
- 1cf4c56480f8 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Improve validator docs on interruptibility
- 873c0fd67872 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Disallow synchronous DNS in libcurl
- d7e40845f923 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Fix postcondition for set_timer on macOS
- 434dbf6907ec 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Use IPv4-only issuer in oauth_validator tests
- 8d9d5843b55f 18.0 landed
-
Work around OAuth/EVFILT_TIMER quirk on NetBSD.
- c301a0a74a8a 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Fix incorrect const markers in struct
- 03366b61dfe5 18.0 landed
-
Add missing entry to oauth_validator test .gitignore
- 2c53dec7f440 18.0 landed
-
cirrus: Temporarily fix libcurl link error
- 9d9a71002a1c 18.0 landed
-
Add support for OAUTHBEARER SASL mechanism
- b3f0be788afc 18.0 landed
-
libpq: Handle asynchronous actions during SASL
- a99a32e43ed7 18.0 landed
-
require_auth: prepare for multiple SASL mechanisms
- f8d8581ed882 18.0 landed
-
Move PG_MAX_AUTH_TOKEN_LENGTH to libpq/auth.h
- e21d6f297158 18.0 landed
-
Make SASL max message length configurable
- 6d16f9debae0 18.0 landed
-
jsonapi: fully initialize dummy lexer
- 41b023946dfd 18.0 landed
-
common/jsonapi: support libpq as a client
- 0785d1b8b2fa 18.0 landed
-
Remove fe_memutils from libpgcommon_shlib
- f1976df5eaf2 18.0 landed
-
Revert ECPG's use of pnstrdup()
- f0096ef13be2 13.17 landed
- 3557185538fe 14.14 landed
- 2de129b356bf 15.9 landed
- ee2997c678d8 16.5 landed
- e9e05c655069 17.0 landed
- 5388216f6adc 18.0 landed
-
Explicitly require password for SCRAM exchange
- adcdb2c8dda4 17.0 landed
-
Refactor SASL exchange to return tri-state status
- 24178e235ea5 17.0 landed
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 02:11:19PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2025-04-08 13:02:11 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 06:57:18PM +0200, Wolfgang Walther wrote: > > > Jacob Champion: > > > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:32 AM Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> wrote: > > > > > And that should also not be a problem for distributions - they could offer a libpq and a libpq_oauth package, where only one of them can be installed at the same time, I guess? * > > > > My outsider understanding is that maintaining this sort of thing > > > > becomes a major headache, because of combinatorics. You don't really > > > > want to ship a libpq and libpq-with-gss and libpq-with-oauth and > > > > libpq-with-oauth-and-gss and ... > > > > > > That would only be the case, if you were to consider those other > > > dependencies as "dangerous" as cURL. But we already depend on them. So if > > > it's really the case that cURL is that much worse, that we consider loading > > > it as a module... then the combinatorics should not be a problem either. > > > > > > However, if the other deps are considered problematic as well, then the ship > > > has already sailed, and there is not point for a special case here anymore. > > > > Yes, I think this is what I am asking too. For me it was curl's > > security reputation and whether that would taint the security reputation > > of libpq. For Tom, I think it was the dependency additions. > > I'd say that curl's security reputation is higher than most of our other > dependencies. We have dependencies for libraries with regular security issues, > with those issues at times not getting addressed for prolonged amounts of > time. I see curl CVEs regularly as part of Debian minor updates, which is why I had concerns, but if it is similar to OpenSSL, and better than other libraries that don't even get CVEs, I guess it okay. However, is this true for libpq libraries or database server libraries. Does it matter? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.