Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>, "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-07-19T03:30:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 07:35:43AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I still don't think that we need both methods based on these numbers, > but there may be more opinions about that? Are people OK if this open > item is discarded? Hearing nothing about this point, removed from the open item list, then. -- Michael
Commits
-
Mark more nodes with attribute no_query_jumble
- 2a507f6fd8b7 16.0 landed
-
Include values of A_Const nodes in query jumbling
- 9ba37b2cb6a1 16.0 landed
-
Generate code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl
- 3db72ebcbe20 16.0 landed
-
Rework format of comments in headers for nodes
- 5d29d525ffe0 16.0 landed
-
Move queryjumble.c code to src/backend/nodes/
- 8eba3e3f0208 16.0 landed
-
Fix some compiler warnings in aset.c and generation.c
- b82557ecc2eb 16.0 cited
-
Reformat some node comments
- 835d476fd21b 16.0 cited