Re: BUG #18000: Access method used by matview can be dropped leaving broken matview
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: exclusion@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-06-28T22:57:40Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Attachments
- v3-0001-Fix-pg_depend-entry-to-AMs-after-ALTER-TABLE-.-SE.patch (text/x-diff) patch v3-0001
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:11:51AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Agreed. I was wondering if this was worth having in this path (other > code paths are rather lax about that), but yes let's do it as there > should not be more than one record in pg_depend. There was something that was itching me a little bit here: shouldn't we also switch the AM dependency of the second relation? In the context of a table rewrite, the new relation is temporary and quickly dropped after the relation files are swapped, but that may not be the case of all the callers of swap_relation_files() depending on the persistency of what they swap and what they want to do. Thoughts? -- Michael
Commits
-
Fix pg_depend entry to AMs after ALTER TABLE .. SET ACCESS METHOD
- 93401ec02f40 15.4 landed
- 97d89101045f 16.0 landed