Horton

Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-06-30T07:09:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:05:59AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> Sounds good -- 0002 can be ignored as needed, then. (Or I can resend a
> v3 for CI purposes, if you'd like.)

I am assuming that this is 0001 posted here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8be3d35a-9608-b1d5-e5e6-7a744ea45fef@timescale.com

And that looks OK to me.  This is something I'd rather backpatch down
to v11 on usability ground for developers.  Any comments or objections
about that?
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Make PG_TEST_NOCLEAN work for temporary directories in TAP tests