Horton

Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-06-09T02:59:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 05:53:40PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Yes. A simpler way of doing it would be to move advance_wal() in
> 019_replslot_limit.pl to Cluster.pm, something like the attached. CI
> members don't complain with it
> https://github.com/BRupireddy/postgres/tree/add_a_function_in_Cluster.pm_to_generate_WAL.
> Perhaps, we can name it better instead of advance_wal, say
> generate_wal or some other?

Why not discussing that on a separate thread?  What you are proposing
is independent of what Vignesh has proposed.  Note that the patch
format is octet-stream, causing extra CRs to exist in the patch.
Something happened on your side when you sent your patch, I guess?
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Refactor routine to find single log content pattern in TAP tests

  2. Refactor log check logic for connect_ok/fails in PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster