Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-06-02T21:21:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 10:35:43AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I think we should avoid the is-defined-in dance and just pull out the version
> numbers for comparisons.  While it's true that LibreSSL doesn't play well with
> OpenSSL versions, they do define their own which can be checked for to
> distinguish the libraries.

Agreed.  How about tackling that in a separate patch?  At this stage,
I would like to not care about ./configure and do it only with meson,
but there is value in reporting the version number in ./configure to
see the version coverage in the buildfarm.
--
Michael

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Remove obsolete unconstify()

  2. Only perform pg_strong_random init when required

  3. Remove support for OpenSSL older than 1.1.0

  4. Support SSL_R_VERSION_TOO_LOW when using LibreSSL

  5. Support disallowing SSL renegotiation when using LibreSSL

  6. Doc: Use past tense for things which happened in the past

  7. Remove support for OpenSSL 1.0.1

  8. Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0