Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-05-21T15:53:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greetings, * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org> writes: > > At 2023-05-20 23:21:57 -0400, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: > >> I thought the plan was to also rename the libpq "gssdeleg" connection > >> parameter and so on? I can look into that tomorrow, if nobody beats > >> me to it. > > > I was trying the change to see if it would be better to name it > > "gssdelegate" instead (as in delegate on one side, and accept the > > delegation on the other), but decided that "gssdelegation=enable" > > reads better than "gssdelegate=enable". > > Yeah, agreed. > > > Here's the diff. > > Thanks for doing that legwork! I found a couple other places where > "deleg" had escaped notice, and changed the lot. Watching the > buildfarm now ... Thanks all for taking this up over a weekend. Stephen
Commits
-
Spell the values of libpq's gssdelegation parameter as "0" and "1".
- 1f9f6aa49198 16.0 landed
-
Expand some more uses of "deleg" to "delegation" or "delegated".
- a2eb99a01e01 16.0 landed
-
Fix remaining references to gss_accept_deleg.
- f4001a553770 16.0 landed
-
rename "gss_accept_deleg" to "gss_accept_delegation".
- 9c0a0e2ed92a 16.0 landed