Horton

Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-05-19T13:07:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Greetings,

* Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote:
> Why is the new PG 16 GUC called "gss_accept_deleg" and not
> "gss_accept_delegation"?  The abbreviation here seems atypical.

At the time it felt natural to me but I don't feel strongly about it,
happy to change it if folks would prefer it spelled out.

Thanks,

Stephen

Commits

  1. Spell the values of libpq's gssdelegation parameter as "0" and "1".

  2. Expand some more uses of "deleg" to "delegation" or "delegated".

  3. Fix remaining references to gss_accept_deleg.

  4. rename "gss_accept_deleg" to "gss_accept_delegation".