Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Anton Kirilov <antonvkirilov@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-05-02T00:42:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 05:06:03PM +0100, Anton Kirilov wrote: > In any case I am not particularly attached to any naming or the exact shape > of the new API, as long as it achieves the same goal (reducing the number of > system calls), but before I make any substantial changes to my patch, I > would like to hear your thoughts on the matter. Another thing that may matter in terms of extensibility? Would a boolean argument really be the best design? Could it be better to have instead one API with a bits32 and some flags controlling its internals? -- Michael
Commits
-
Remove some comments related to pqPipelineSync() and PQsendPipelineSync()
- 061cc7eacac1 17.0 landed
-
libpq: Add PQsendPipelineSync()
- 4794c2d31714 17.0 landed
-
Fix stop condition for dumping GRANT commands
- 7b7fa8513033 16.0 cited