Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-04-11T06:00:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: use "an SQL" consistently rather than "a SQL"
- a78cf591a3f5 19 (unreleased) landed
- d866f0374ca6 16.0 landed
- 7bdd489d3d32 15.0 landed
-
Doc: use "an SQL" instead of "a SQL"
- b1b13d2b524e 17.0 landed
-
Use the correct article for abbreviations
- 04539e73faaa 14.0 landed
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:43:04PM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > That alarm went off today. > > There seem to be only 3 "a SQL"s in the docs to change to "an SQL". > > This is a pretty old thread, so here's a link [1] to the discussion. Good catches! -- Michael