Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-04-06T02:08:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Revert structural changes to not-null constraints

  2. Fix inconsistencies in error messages

  3. Disallow direct change of NO INHERIT of not-null constraints

  4. Disallow NO INHERIT not-null constraints on partitioned tables

  5. Better handle indirect constraint drops

  6. Don't try to assign smart names to constraints

  7. Fix restore of not-null constraints with inheritance

  8. ATTACH PARTITION: Don't match a PK with a UNIQUE constraint

  9. Fix propagating attnotnull in multiple inheritance

  10. Check stack depth in new recursive functions

  11. Move privilege check to the right place

  12. Update information_schema definition for not-null constraints

  13. Fix not-null constraint test

  14. Disallow changing NO INHERIT status of a not-null constraint

  15. Catalog not-null constraints

  16. parallel_schedule: add comment on event_trigger test dependency

  17. Revert "Catalog NOT NULL constraints" and fallout

  18. Adjust contrib/sepgsql regression test expected outputs.

  19. Fix table name clash in recently introduced test

  20. Catalog NOT NULL constraints

  21. Change the rules for inherited CHECK constraints to be essentially the same

On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 06:54:54PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-04-06 01:33:56 +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I'll go over this again tomorrow with fresh eyes, but I think it should
>> be pretty close to ready.  (Need to amend docs to note the new NO
>> INHERIT option for NOT NULL table constraints, and make sure pg_dump
>> complies.)
> 
> Missed this thread somehow.  This is not a review - I just want to say that I
> am very excited that we might finally catalogue NOT NULL constraints. This has
> been a long time in the making...

+1!
--
Michael