Re: Improve pg_stat_statements by making jumble handle savepoint names better

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 07:53:02AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I think that I'm OK with your proposal as savepoint names are in
> defined places in these queries (contrary to some of the craziness
> with BEGIN and the node structure of TransactionStmt, for example).
> 
> Has somebody an opinion or a comment to share?

Well, on second look this is really simple, so I've applied that after
adding back some comments that ought to be and simplifying a bit the
tests (less queries, same coverage).
--
Michael