Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability
Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-02-27T15:42:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Jakub Wartak wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 3:06 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > > Why is this done before we even have gotten -2 back? Even if we need it, it > > seems like we ought to defer this until necessary. > > Not fixed yet: maybe we could even do a `static` with > `has_this_run_earlier` and just perform this work only once during the > first time? Not sure I get your idea, could you share what the code would look like? Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
doc: Correct pg_shmem_allocations_numa.size data type
- b8a6078ca8f4 18.0 landed
-
Add pg_buffercache_numa view with NUMA node info
- ba2a3c2302f1 18.0 landed
-
Add support for basic NUMA awareness
- 65c298f61fc7 18.0 landed
-
Introduce pg_shmem_allocations_numa view
- 8cc139bec34a 18.0 landed